Lizo Mzimba
Leisure correspondent
Getty Pictures
Dan Wootton has no longer but filed a defence to the declare
A former colleague of Dan Wootton was once tricked via the journalist and broadcaster into sending intimate photos and an particular video of himself, in keeping with a case lodged on the Prime Courtroom.
A listening to on Tuesday heard that Mr Wootton pretended to be a lady, the use of the title “Maria Joseph”, in on-line messages with the person who has introduced this situation, who cannot be named.
In written submissions, the person’s barrister Justin Levinson informed the courtroom that Mr Wootton despatched the person partly and bare images of a lady, in addition to a video of a pair having intercourse, in 2010.
Mr Levinson mentioned the person were deceived via Mr Wootton into believing he were exchanging messages with the girl within the photographs.
The listening to heard that consequently, the person idea he was once speaking to a lady who was once serious about a sexual courting, and that consequently he despatched intimate images and a video of himself wearing out a intercourse act.
Mr Levinson informed the courtroom that Mr Wootton had “tricked the claimant into offering those photographs”.
The person therefore turned into conscious that “Maria Joseph” didn’t exist, and that he had in reality despatched the pictures to Mr Wootton.
The person has now introduced a declare in opposition to the previous Solar and GB Information journalist, alleging he were the sufferer of “acquiring sexual photographs” via deceit, and that it ended in him “struggling harm (together with psychiatric harm)”.
The case is at an early level and Mr Wootton has no longer but filed a defence to the declare.
At Tuesday’s listening to, Mr Wootton requested the courtroom to permit the person to be named publicly.
Mr Wootton’s barrister Samuel Rowe argued that after a courtroom order was once made previous this 12 months granting the person anonymity, Mr Wootton was once no longer given enough understand in an effort to problem it in courtroom.
This was once rejected via Pass judgement on Roger Eastman.
Mr Rowe additionally argued that if the courtroom were informed some related data, it could were justified in no longer granting the order.
Mr Rowe mentioned those issues integrated the truth that Mr Wootton were investigated via the Metropolitan Police and Police Scotland in reference to the allegation that he used faux on-line identities to acquire particular photographs with out consent, and that each forces had concluded that no additional motion can be taken and ended their investigations.
Mr Levinson informed the courtroom that so far as he was once conscious, the ones investigations didn’t relate to the claimant’s grievance, however to identical ones.
The pass judgement on once more mentioned the ones problems had been no reason why for lifting the anonymity order.
As well as, Mr Rowe argued that granting anonymity indignant the primary of open justice.
The pass judgement on rejected that argument and mentioned there was once “transparent proof of attainable opposed and significantly opposed results at the claimant if the claimant’s title being within the public area on this case”.
